Katrian Debates
Debate themes and Teams.
- Race played a role in the disaster response to Katrina.
Pro:Katie, Vyvie, Malik, Casey, Hong
Con: Talena, Sunny, Jamie, Sandra, Thu
- Human caused environmental damage made Katrian worse.
Pro: Sean, Ashley, Andy, Lindsay
Con: Megan, Graciela, Mapa, Kinsey, Elizabeth
- The government abandoned the people of New Orleans
Pro Side: Lewis, Kirubel, AJ, Taylor
Con Side: Anton, James, Xaxier, Stephi
Two good descriptions of how a debate works can be found on the web
The first by
James Tomlinson describes the format of the classic Lincoln-Douglas debates.
The second
prepared by Education World gives some strategies for debaters to use
to increase their persuasiveness.
Because the time we have is limited to 24 minutes per debate, we will
use the following format adapted from the Education World site.
- Teams will be composed of approximately 5 students.
- The format will be
- (5 minutes) Affirmative position debater presents constructive debate points.
- (2 minutes) Negative position debater cross-examines affirmative points.
- (5 minutes) Negative position presents constructive debate points.
- (2 minutes) Affirmative position cross-examines negative points.
- (3 minutes) Affirmative position offers first rebuttal
- (5 minutes) Negative position offers first rebuttal
- (2 minutes) Affirmative position offers second rebuttal
- (24 minutes) total
- Note that one team (the Affirmative) gets to talk 4 times, and the other (The Negative)
gets to talk 3 times. Each team gets equal amount of time. A different team member
will talk each time.
- Liz will be the moderator.
- Tim will be the judge.
It is best if each team studies the different startegies on the Education World
page, and chooses 1 or two as their debate preparation strategy.
When
Debates will be held in class on Wednesday, Feb. 6, 2008.
Back to theDaily Record.
Back to the class web-page.