When reviewers review a book they may evaluate it along many different dimensions.

• Does the book inform the reader?
• Is the book a good piece of literature?
• Is the book worth reading?
• Does it have something important to say?
• Is the book entertaining?
• Is the plot interesting?
• Are the characters believable?
• Does it reflect the issues of today?
• Is it historically accurate?

1. Review by Aaron Hughes Fantastic Reviews
2. Review by Natasha Walter The Guardian

Work in groups of two.

• For each review do the following
  1. List the dimensions that the author evaluates the book along.
  2. Does the author like the book? Does she recommend it?
  3. What side of the debate do you think the reviewer is on. Does she agree with the FDA's opinion, or does she agree with the "13 Myths" position?
  4. Are there any arguments used by the reviewer that you agree with? That you disagree with? Tell me why.
• On what issues do both reviews agree? (If any)
• On what issues do the reviews disagree?
• Does the review leave out important missing information?
• Create written answers to these questions. Put your names of group members on report, and e-mail it to Professor Sheard.

When you have done. Report to the whole mentor session. Feel free to read additional reviews of the book to help inform your opinion.

More reviews of Oryx and Crake

Back to the Daily Record.

Back to the class web-page.