Report on both sides of the Turing Argument

Split up into 7 groups. One group per table, as follows.

1
Roy, Tony Page, Kylee Paulsen, Kyle A. Howard, Christopher C. Phan, Minh N. Adkins, Jillian E.
2
Herbertson, Robert P. Caldwell, Lindsey M. Edgerton, Andrea L. Moe, David R. Shupenka, Andrei M. Jones, Ryan C.
3
Bakke, Brian M. Norum, Alexander P. Martinez, Anthony J. Herbst, Delaney K. Alattar, Omar Souza, Ryan D.
4
Baldwin, Jacob D. Douglas, Scott D. Ebert, Jacqueline E. Houseman, Sally M. Story, Natasha C.

5
Chadbourne, Eileen M. Lazar, David Foote, Jennifer L. Anderson, Troy S. Abramowitz, Bryan J.
6
Alhamdan, Abdullah McClintock, Victor L. Ramku, Dinela Kempter, Aaron M. Brewer, Zachary A.
7
Fiscu, Samuel Rose, Adam T. Hansen, Nicole R. Angelus, Austin C. Nemeth, Will Fletcher A.

Using your knowledge of Turings 1950 paper, and Stevan Harnad's critique, make a Poster Page summarizing both sides of one of Turings arguments, or both sides of one of Harnad's arguments.

Turing

Theological
Head in the sand
Mathematical
Consciousness
Disability
Lady Lovelace's objection
Continuity of nervous system
Informality of behaviour
ESP
Learning Machines

Harnad

Performance Capacity as test.
5 level hierarchy of tests
Language as universal criteria
Autonomy

The point of the exercise is to fairly represent both sides arguments.

You should use use words, diagrams, lists, pictures, color, etc. to emphasize your thoughts.

Each group will have 3 minuites to report back to the class. You should choose 1 or 2 people to make the report.

Back to the Daily Record.

Back to the class web-page.