 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| • |
What
about a linked list of arrays
|
|
|
|
– |
where
every n items are stored in the first node, the
|
|
|
|
next
n items are stored in the second node, etc.
|
|
|
|
– |
This
still requires traversal to get to the right node, but
|
|
|
then
from there direct access can be used to insert,
|
|
|
|
retrieve,
remove the data
|
|
|
|
– |
May
be the best of both worlds for relative lists,
|
|
|
|
limiting
the amount of shifting to “n” items while at
|
|
|
|
the
same time keeping the traversal to a manageable
|
|
|
|
level
|
|