(Message inbox:69) Return-Path: bart@cs.pdx.edu Delivery-Date: Wed May 12 21:25:01 2004 Return-Path: Received: from bart.cs.pdx.edu (bart.cs.pdx.edu [131.252.214.14]) by iron.cat.pdx.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4D4OwYq014202 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 21:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bart.cs.pdx.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by bart.cs.pdx.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BO7mE-0002kn-00 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 21:24:58 -0700 To: Jim Binkley Subject: Re: almost I think In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 12 May 2004 13:16:43 PDT." <200405122016.i4CKGhLJ016899@sirius.cs.pdx.edu> Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 21:24:58 -0700 From: Bart Massey Message-Id: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new You can turn off LaTeX hyphenation altogether, or prevent specific hyphenations. I think there's a better way to do this, but using an \mbox{} around a word should stop its hypenation \mbox{nohyphenateme}. Don't worry about the baselinestretch at this point. I think you can hear the Buddha's middle name if you do that one-handed clapping thing. Just tell me you don't hear Keanu. See you tomorrow. Bart In message <200405122016.i4CKGhLJ016899@sirius.cs.pdx.edu> you wrote: > > http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~jrb/public_html/bart.tar.gz > > I used your label ... but put the paper ID, and pagecount > in the address, as I thought it should just be bloody obvious. > Seemed buried a bit down in keyword land. > > One question: is it possible to convince tex to not > break words like "attack" up into at- tack ... split > across lines? > > You also mentioned the notion of baselinestretch ... > "to get the wrap more reasonable", which I did not > understand and haven't done at this point. > > I'll read it tomorrow morning and finalize it. I might > even pitch it. > > Suresh is back. He acquired "Siddartha" to go with "Gautam". > Question: did the enlightened one have a middle name? > (hint: rhetorical question). > (I always claim that our cat's middle name, is *the*, > as in Fricka the cat.). > > j. >